How should an officer respond if asked a question that has been objected to?

How should an officer respond if asked a question that has been objected to?

• A. Answer immediately if you know the truth
• B. Wait until prompted by the judge
• C. Respond with an assumption
• D. Ignore the objection and respond

Answer: (B)

When an officer is asked a question that has been objected to, the appropriate response is to wait until prompted by the judge. This is essential because the judge is responsible for determining what evidence is admissible in court. When an objection is raised, it indicates that there is a concern about the legality or relevance of the question being posed. By waiting for the judge’s prompt, the officer ensures that they are abiding by court rules and respecting the judicial process. The judiciary can assess the objection and either sustain or overrule it, which ultimately informs the officer whether it is appropriate to answer the question. This procedure is vital for maintaining the integrity of the legal process and ensuring that all information presented is admissible and relevant to the case at hand.

When an officer is asked a question that has been objected to, the appropriate response is to wait until prompted by the judge. This is essential because the judge is responsible for determining what evidence is admissible in court. When an objection is raised, it indicates that there is a concern about the legality or relevance of the question being posed.

By waiting for the judge’s prompt, the officer ensures that they are abiding by court rules and respecting the judicial process. The judiciary can assess the objection and either sustain or overrule it, which ultimately informs the officer whether it is appropriate to answer the question. This procedure is vital for maintaining the integrity of the legal process and ensuring that all information presented is admissible and relevant to the case at hand.